Noisecatcher

Noisecatcher

Field guide — ethos, vocabulary & practice
Part of the Politics of Noise research practice by Sylvain Souklaye

What this is

Noisecatcher is a free, open web application that gives anyone with a smartphone the ability to measure noise pollution in real time, understand its health consequences, and contribute to a living, peer-to-peer map of acoustic environments.

It is an electroacoustic instrument — a civic device that mediates between the acoustic world and collective knowledge. It is also a co-presence device: through its peer-to-peer community layer, listeners who are physically dispersed become acoustically present to one another, sharing evidence of the sonic conditions they inhabit without a central server, without surveillance infrastructure.

It is a civic instrument, an activist tool, and a phenomenological device. Its aim is to democratize acoustic monitoring — to give communities the means to document, contest, and act on noise as an environmental and social justice issue.

Ethos & practice

The instrument and its performer

Like any electroacoustic instrument, Noisecatcher requires a performer. The smartphone alone is inert — it becomes an instrument only through the engaged body of a listener. The microphone transduces pressure into voltage; the algorithm transduces voltage into meaning; but the listener provides the intentionality that makes the act of listening political. You are not a user of this tool. You are its performer, its operator, its witness.

The human device

The human body is the primary sensing device. The smartphone makes nothing perceptible that the ear has not already received. The human device is the necessary condition for the tech device to exist. You — your presence, your attention, your body in a place — are the instrument.

Supported

External microphones are welcome and improve measurement quality. Lavalier, cardioid, or omnidirectional mics connected via the headphone jack, USB-C, or Lightning are detected automatically. A device selector appears on the Meter screen when multiple inputs are available.

Not compatible with this practice

Noise-canceling earphones and earbuds are explicitly forbidden during a Noisecatcher session. This is not a technical constraint — it is an ethical one.

Active noise cancellation severs three fundamental connections:

  • People from each other. A listener wearing noise-canceling headphones removes themselves from the acoustic commons. The shared sonic condition — the condition that generates solidarity — is dissolved.
  • People from their environment. The soundscape carries information: about danger, inequality, the presence of others. Canceling it cancels the evidence. What is not heard cannot be documented or contested.
  • The self from its own condition. The self is at the center of the listening experience. To cancel ambient sound is to make oneself less present. Deep listening begins with accepting what is there.

Noise cancellation is a profitable industry built on privatizing a response to a public health crisis. Binaural headsets without active cancellation are acceptable for listening to recordings.

Deep listening as political act

The practice of listening without cancellation — of attending fully to the acoustic environment — is both a phenomenological discipline and a political stance. It insists that the conditions of noise are real, shared, and worth documenting. It refuses private escape in favour of collective witnessing.

When you measure sound, you name a condition. When you pin a location, you make an argument about space, power, and the right to a liveable acoustic environment. Listening here is social. Listening here is political.

WHO reference thresholds

LevelRangeHealth context
Safe0–69 dB(A)Below WHO environmental noise concern threshold
Caution70–84 dB(A)Prolonged exposure may cause hearing fatigue; sleep disturbance risk
Dangerous85–99 dB(A)Permanent hearing damage possible after 8 h/day; cardiovascular risk
Critical100+ dB(A)Rapid hearing damage; acute pain possible above 120 dB; LRAD range

Key vocabulary — from the Abécédaire

dB(A)
A-weighted decibels. A logarithmic scale that approximates human hearing sensitivity. 3 dB(A) represents a doubling of sound intensity; 10 dB(A) feels roughly twice as loud.
Soundscape
R. Murray Schafer's term for the total acoustic environment of a place. Geophony (natural sounds), biophony (life sounds), anthrophony (human-made sounds). Every soundscape is a social document.
Acoustic Racism
The differential distribution of noise burden along racial and class lines. Highways, airports, and industrial facilities are systematically located in or near communities of colour and low-income neighbourhoods.
Sonic Warfare
Steve Goodman's concept: the use of sound as an instrument of power, control, and violence. From LRAD crowd dispersal to music-as-torture in detention. The acoustic as a domain of political force.
LRAD
Long Range Acoustic Device. Directed-energy sound weapon routinely deployed against protesters. Capable of 162 dB at 1m; permanent hearing damage at 100 m. Documented globally by Amnesty International and HRW.
Infrasound
Sound below 20 Hz — below the threshold of human hearing but not of human sensation. Industrial wind turbines, compressors, and military systems generate infrasound linked to anxiety and nausea.
Participatory sensing
Citizen science methodology where distributed individuals collect environmental data. Projects like NoiseCapture (IFSTTAR/Gustave Eiffel) and NoiseTube pioneered smartphone-based urban noise mapping.
Right to the city
Henri Lefebvre's framework, extended to sound: the right to collectively shape the acoustic environment is part of the right to inhabit urban space. Noise is a dimension of territorial inequality.

What to do with a measurement

  • Document precisely. Note time, location, duration, and source category. A GPS-tagged pin with a decibel reading is civic evidence.
  • File a formal complaint. Most jurisdictions have environmental noise complaint mechanisms — municipal noise offices, environmental agencies, planning authorities. Use the Act section of the app for country-specific resources.
  • Coordinate with neighbours. Repeated measurements from multiple people at multiple times of day constitute a pattern. Patterns have legal weight.
  • Submit to journalists and researchers. Tagged, timestamped data is usable evidence for investigative reporting, academic research, and legal advocacy.
  • At a protest or near acoustic weapons. Protect your hearing first — distance yourself, use passive ear protection if available. Record second. Your data can support accountability investigations and press documentation.