What to do
Measuring noise is step one. Understand it, map it, and use it.
Noise is not equally distributed
Noise pollution is an environmental justice issue. Across cities worldwide, low-income neighbourhoods, communities of colour, and renters near highways, airports, and industrial zones bear a disproportionate noise burden — while having the least political power to challenge it.
Children & schools
WHO recommends ≤35 dB(A) inside classrooms. Schools near expressways routinely exceed 70 dB. Chronic noise impairs reading, memory, and cognitive development. This is not an individual problem — it is a policy failure.
Night workers & shift workers
WHO guidelines set 40 dB(A) Lnight for outdoor residential areas. Freight hubs, distribution centres, and transit depots impose a second noise burden on communities that already work night hours.
Renters & housing precarity
Homeowners can move. Tenants often cannot. Noise ordinance enforcement is weaker in areas with lower property values and higher tenant turnover. Documenting patterns over time — exactly what this app enables — is how tenants build cases.
Right to quiet
Access to quiet natural soundscapes is an environmental right. The EU's Environmental Noise Directive mandates the protection of 'quiet areas' in agglomerations. Urban green space is not just aesthetic — it is acoustic refuge.
Know the thresholds
The WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines (2018) set the following maximum safe levels for the European Region. These are recommendations — not legally binding in most countries — but they are the scientific basis for noise law across the EU and beyond.
Lden = day-evening-night weighted average. Lnight = 23:00–07:00. Most urban environments exceed several of these thresholds.
The scale of the crisis
In Europe, noise pollution is the second largest environmental health riskafter air pollution. The European Environment Agency's 2025 report quantifies the damage for the first time at full scale.
73,000
premature deaths per year in Europe from transport noise (EEA 2025)
1.3 M
DALYs (disability-adjusted life-years) lost annually — up from 1 M in 2011
22,000
new type 2 diabetes cases per year in Europe linked to noise exposure
€95.6 B
estimated annual economic cost of transport noise in Europe (EEA 2025)
These figures cover Europe only. No equivalent global estimate exists — most cities in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America have no peer-reviewed noise monitoring data. Among the cities with documented research: Cairo (85–90 dB average street noise, Egyptian NRC); Ho Chi Minh City (103 dB, UN-cited); São Paulo schools (70.3 dB LAeq weekdays, Nature 2026). The absence of data does not mean the absence of harm.
EEA — Environmental Noise in Europe 2025Noise as a human rights issue
Across jurisdictions, courts and legislatures have established that noise pollution is not merely an inconvenience but a violation of fundamental rights. These instruments give your data legal standing.
ECHR Article 8 — Hatton v. UK (2003)
The European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) held that states have positive obligations to protect residents from severe noise under the right to private and family life. Heathrow night flights violated this right. Foundational for noise-based ECHR complaints in all Council of Europe member states.
India Supreme Court — Right to life (2005)
Forum for Prevention of Environmental and Sound Pollution v. Union of India (2005) SCC 733 ruled that 'freedom from noise pollution is part of the right to life' under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution — one of the strongest constitutional noise rulings globally, leading to a ban on firecrackers between 10pm and 6am.
US Noise Control Act (1972) — defunded 1981
The only comprehensive US federal noise law was gutted by the Reagan administration in 1981. The EPA Office of Noise Abatement and Control has been unfunded for 45 years. Noise regulation in the US is now fragmented across thousands of local ordinances, with weakest enforcement in the most exposed communities.
Colombia Law 2450/2025
Latin America's first dedicated national noise law, passed in 2025. Establishes noise limits, monitoring obligations, and enforcement mechanisms — a model for noise legislation in the Global South.
Sonic Apartheid — noise as racial geography
Research from the University of Cape Town (Alexandra Downing Watkins) documents how forced relocations in post-apartheid Cape Town (including Blikkiesdorp, cleared before the 2010 World Cup) placed Black and Coloured communities in high-noise industrial zones with no political recourse. US studies (Casey et al. 2017; Collins et al. 2020) document the same pattern nationally. Noise burden follows the lines of racial and economic geography — a structural injustice, not an accident.
How to use your measurements
Noisecatcher readings are indicative, not legally certified. A smartphone microphone is not a Class 1 or Class 2 sound level meter (IEC 61672-1:2013). This matters for how your data can be used.
What your data CAN do
Establish a documented pattern over time (recurring noise, specific times)
Support a complaint with timestamped, geolocated evidence
Demonstrate which WHO thresholds are routinely exceeded
Strengthen a collective case when combined with other contributors
Accompany a request for official certified measurement
Provide evidence for tenant-landlord disputes
What your data CANNOT do alone
Serve as sole technical evidence in legal proceedings
Replace a certified noise assessment (e.g., for planning disputes)
Prove absolute sound pressure levels with regulatory precision
Export your pins as GeoJSON from the map page. The file includes dB readings, timestamps, GPS coordinates, bearing, category, pin status, and description — enough to build a documented case. The export is also compatible with NoiseCapture (Université Gustave Eiffel), the open-source citizen noise sensing platform, so your data can feed directly into community datasets.
Select pins, compute statistics, add legal context, and generate a print-ready complaint document — ready to file with a council, tribunal, or ECHR submission.
See how sound levels at specific locations have changed over time — the tool for documenting sonic displacement in gentrifying neighbourhoods and post-conflict areas.
Measurement methodology
Forensic documentation techniques, acoustic science (dBA / dBC / dBZ / NDSI), AI classification caveats, chain-of-custody guidance, advanced smartphone sensing, and known limitations — all on the Methodology page.
Community data & Noise-Planet federation
You are not measuring alone. Noise-Planet aggregates millions of dB(A) readings contributed by NoiseCapture users worldwide into an open, queryable map. In Noisecatcher, you can overlay this community data directly on your map — and export your pins back in NoiseCapture-compatible GeoJSON to contribute to the commons.
Overlay community data
The Noise-Planet community layer shows crowdsourced noise measurements from around the world. Use it to contextualise your own readings, identify chronic hotspots others have documented, and understand your neighbourhood in a global acoustic frame.
Export as NoiseCapture GeoJSON
Your pins export in a format compatible with NoiseCapture and the OGC standard. Each feature carries laeq, timestamp, GPS coordinates, category, pin status (predicted/active/historical), and description. Attach this file to complaints, submit it to environmental agencies, or share it with researchers.
Collective cases are stronger
A single measurement establishes a data point. A month of measurements establishes a pattern. A neighbourhood of measurements — yours and your neighbours', overlaid with community data — establishes a crisis. Environmental agencies and courts respond to spatial patterns, not isolated incidents.
Template complaint
Adapt this to your situation. Attach your exported GeoJSON or screenshots as supporting evidence.
Worldwide Reporting Resources
Official reporting channels, environmental agencies, legal frameworks, and advocacy organisations — covering 30+ countries across all world regions.
41 countries & regions · 117 resources worldwide
🌍 InternationalInternational
WHO — Environmental Noise Guidelines (2018)SCIUNEP — Noise pollution overviewSCIEEA — Environmental Noise in EuropeMAPISO 1996 — Acoustics: Description & measurement of noiseSCIRight to Quiet Society (international)NGOQuiet Communities (advocacy network)NGOCommunity Noise Lab — holistic community noise & health research platformSCIForensic Architecture — acoustic investigation & human rights (Goldsmiths, London)NGOSyntone — revue de l'écoute critique et de la création sonore (France)SCIMonoskop — open bibliography: noise theory, sound art, acoustic politicsSCI🇪🇺 European UnionEurope
EU Environmental Noise Directive 2002/49/ECLAWEEA Noise Viewer — interactive mapMAPEU Quiet Areas — protected soundscapesMAP🇫🇷 FranceEurope
Signal Conso — signaler un bruitGOVACNUSA — Autorité de contrôle des nuisances aéroportuairesGOVBruitparif — observatoire bruit Île-de-FranceMAPService-public.fr — bruit de voisinageLAWVotre mairie — nuisances chantiersGOVPour le bruit de voisinage, contacter la mairie ou un médiateur avant toute procédure judiciaire.
🇩🇪 GermanyEurope
Umweltbundesamt — Lärm (Noise)GOVLärmkarte — federal noise mapsMAPDEGA — Deutsche Gesellschaft für AkustikSCIStädtischer Lärmbeschwerden — via local OrdnungsamtGOVFile complaints with your local Ordnungsamt (public order office) or Umweltamt.
🇬🇧 United KingdomEurope
GOV.UK — complain about noiseGOVCivil Aviation Authority — aircraft noiseGOVNoise Abatement SocietyNGOEnvironmental Protection Act 1990 — statutory nuisanceLAWCIEH — Noise guidance for practitionersSCI🇳🇱 NetherlandsEurope
RIVM — Geluid en gezondheidSCIGeluidloket — national noise deskGOVWet geluidhinder — noise nuisance lawLAW🇧🇪 BelgiumEurope
OVAM — omgevingslawaai (Flanders)GOVBruxelles Environnement — nuisances sonoresGOVSPW — bruit en WallonieGOV🇨🇭 SwitzerlandEurope
BAFU/OFEV — Lärm / BruitGOVSonBase — noise map SwitzerlandMAPOrdonnance sur la protection contre le bruit (OPB)LAW🇪🇸 SpainEurope
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente — ruidoGOVLey del Ruido (Ley 37/2003)LAWAENA — ruido aeroportuarioGOV🇮🇹 ItalyEurope
ISPRA — acustica ambientaleSCISNPA — Sistema nazionale protezione ambienteGOVLegge quadro sull'inquinamento acustico (L.447/1995)LAW🇺🇸 United StatesNorth America
EPA — noise pollution regulationGOVFAA — aviation noise complaintsGOVFTA — transit noise guidelinesGOVFHWA — highway noise policyLAWNoise Free AmericaNGONoise Pollution ClearinghouseNGONYC DEP Noise App — report & track city noise complaints (New York)GOVNoise ordinances are primarily local (city/county). Contact your city council for neighbourhood complaints.
🇨🇦 CanadaNorth America
Environment and Climate Change Canada — noiseGOVNAV Canada — aircraft noiseGOVOntario MOE — noise guidelinesLAWEnvironmental protection is shared between federal and provincial governments.
🇧🇷 BrazilLatin America
IBAMA — poluição sonoraGOVCONAMA Resolução 001/90 — ruídoLAWABNT NBR 10151 — medição de ruídoSCICardoso, L. — Sound-Politics in São Paulo (OUP, 2019) — landmark study of noise governance & social inequality in Brazilian citiesSCI🇦🇷 ArgentinaLatin America
SAyDS — ruido ambientalGOV🇨🇴 ColombiaLatin America
MADS — resolución 0627 de 2006 (norma nacional de ruido)LAWIDEAM — calidad del aire y ruidoGOV🇨🇳 ChinaAsia-Pacific
生态环境部 — 噪声污染 (MEE noise pollution)GOV全国噪声污染防治行动计划 (National Noise Action Plan)LAW12369 — 环保举报热线 (Environmental complaint hotline)GOV中国环境噪声污染防治报告SCI拨打12369热线举报噪音污染。各地环保局负责地方噪声执法。
🇯🇵 JapanAsia-Pacific
環境省 — 騒音・振動 (Ministry of Environment — Noise)GOV騒音規制法 — Noise Control LawLAW国土交通省 — 航空機騒音 (MLIT — Aircraft noise)GOV公害等調整委員会 — Pollution Dispute Coordination CommissionLAW騒音の苦情は市区町村の環境課へ。航空機騒音は国土交通省へ。
🇰🇷 South KoreaAsia-Pacific
환경부 — 소음·진동 (Ministry of Environment)GOV국가소음정보시스템 — National Noise InformationMAP소음·진동관리법 — Noise and Vibration Control ActLAW🇮🇳 IndiaAsia-Pacific
CPCB — Noise Pollution (Regulation & Control) Rules 2000LAWMinistry of Environment — noise standardsGOVPCB Complaint portal — state pollution control boardsGOVComplaints filed with State Pollution Control Boards. Dial 1800-11-4000 for environmental helpline.
🇦🇺 AustraliaAsia-Pacific
EPA Victoria — noise complaintsGOVEPA NSW — noiseGOVARPANSA — aviation noiseGOVANEF — Aircraft Noise Exposure ForecastMAPEnvironmental protection is a state responsibility — contact your state EPA.
🇳🇿 New ZealandAsia-Pacific
Ministry for the Environment — noiseGOVNZS 6801/6802 — Acoustics measurement standardsSCI🇦🇪 UAEMiddle East
Ministry of Climate Change & EnvironmentGOVDubai Municipality — noise complaintsGOVAbu Dhabi EAD — environmental noiseGOVشكاوى الضوضاء: اتصل ببلدية دبي على 800900 أو هيئة البيئة والمياه.
🇸🇦 Saudi ArabiaMiddle East
وزارة البيئة والمياه — التلوث الضوضائي (Ministry of Environment)GOVالهيئة العامة للطيران المدني — ضوضاء الطيران (GACA — aviation noise)GOV🇯🇴 JordanMiddle East
وزارة البيئة — تلوث ضوضائيGOV🇲🇦 MoroccoMiddle East
Ministère de la Transition Écologique — bruitGOV🇿🇦 South AfricaAfrica
DFFE — Environmental noiseGOVSANS 10103 — Measurement and rating of noiseSCINational Noise Reduction Regulations (NEMA)LAW🇰🇪 KenyaAfrica
NEMA — Noise and Excessive Vibration Pollution Control Regs (2009)LAWNEMA Noise complaint formGOV🇳🇬 NigeriaAfrica
NESREA — National Environmental (Noise Standards) RegulationsLAWNESREA complaint hotline — 0800CALLNESREAGOV🇬🇭 GhanaAfrica
EPA Ghana — noise pollutionGOV🌍 WHO Africa RegionAfrica
WHO AFRO — environmental healthSCIAdvocacy & support
Noise Abatement Society (UK)Noise Free AmericaQuiet Communities (USA)Right to Quiet Society (international)Bruitparif — observatoire du bruit en Île-de-FranceEarshot NGO — acoustic advocacyNoise Planet — open noise scienceEnd Transport Poverty (UK)Réseau Action Climat (France)European Environment Agency — noise dataField protocols — high-risk situations
These protocols apply when you are documenting in dangerous conditions. Adapt them to your local legal context. In all cases: your safety first, documentation second.
🔊 Sonic warfare / LRAD / acoustic weapons
- • Move perpendicular, not back. LRAD beams are narrow (~15–30°). Stepping sideways cuts intensity faster than retreating.
- • Protect your ears immediately. Foam earplugs reduce exposure by ~30 dB. Cupping hands over ears is a stopgap. Hearing damage from a single LRAD exposure is permanent.
- • Start recording before the event. Capture at minimum: bearing, distance estimate, number of pulses, any warning given. Noisecatcher logs GPS + Leq automatically.
- • Note the operator (police unit, vehicle markings, private security) and any crowd size or conditions. This is essential for legal accountability.
- • Document after: note any tinnitus, hearing loss, dizziness, or nausea — these are symptoms of acoustic trauma and may support a legal complaint.
- • Do not aim your phone directly at the LRAD transducer at close range; the microphone membrane can be damaged.
✊ Protest / civil unrest
- • Record continuously from the start, not only when sound levels spike. Timestamp gaps are exploited in court to dispute the sequence of events.
- • Log the quiet too. A pin documenting baseline crowd noise before police deployment establishes reference; a second pin after documents the escalation.
- • Keep your screen dim and notifications silent. Bright screens draw attention; notification sounds can trigger alerts from crowd control.
- • Enable airplane mode + Wi-Fi only if you suspect IMSI catcher surveillance — GPS still works without mobile data.
- • Back up continuously. Use Noisecatcher's export to send pins to a secure cloud or a trusted contact before any detention risk.
- • Know your legal rights to record in public in your jurisdiction before you attend. In most democracies, audio recording in public is lawful; some require all-party consent.
🚔 Police arrest / detention
- • Export and share your data before arrest becomes likely. Once your device is seized, recordings may be inaccessible or deleted.
- • Use a strong PIN, not biometrics. In many jurisdictions, police can compel biometric unlock; a PIN requires a court order.
- • Note the time of arrest and any sounds during detention: commands given, weapons used, ambient noise level. You can reconstruct a log later from memory.
- • Request a lawyer before any interview. Do not discuss your recordings or documentation methods without legal counsel.
- • After release, write a detailed account immediately including all acoustic events (flash-bangs, sirens, shouting, crowd noise) with approximate times.
🚧 Border control / checkpoint
- • Document before you reach the checkpoint — once officers have visual contact, open recording is difficult. Use a timed session from inside a bag if legally permitted.
- • Record checkpoint soundscape as evidence: loudspeaker commands, vehicle noise, alarm systems, and the frequency/volume of orders given can document degrading treatment.
- • Keep data encrypted and backed up remotely before crossing. Border agents in many countries may search devices without a warrant.
- • If a device is seized, note the time, the officer's name or badge number, and any receipts given. Report to a digital rights organisation (EFF, Access Now, Reporters Without Borders).
- • Log GPS coordinates at the checkpoint. For occupied territories, this georeferenced data is valuable to human rights organisations.
⚠️ White supremacist attack / far-right violence
- • Safety first: leave the area if you can do so safely. Do not stay to document if doing so puts you at direct physical risk.
- • From a safe distance, capture audio continuously. Far-right intimidation relies heavily on amplified sound: bullhorns, vehicle horns, coordinated chanting. These are acoustic evidence of targeted harassment.
- • Record slurs, threats, and commands verbatim in a text note immediately after. Audio corroboration of specific language strengthens hate crime reporting.
- • Log the category as "Fascism / far-right violence" in Noisecatcher with an accurate description. GPS, timestamp, and Leq make the record harder to dismiss.
- • Report to: local police (request a hate crime reference number), national extremism monitoring organisations (HOPE not hate, ADL, SOS Racisme, etc.), and anti-fascist legal support networks.
- • Share your export with a trusted contact or organisation before any police interaction — recordings of hate crimes have been seized and suppressed.
From measurement to justice practice
Measurement alone is not a justice practice. A noise map without community interpretation is just another dataset — one that can be absorbed by the same planning systems that produced the injustice. The methods below move from recording to power: they build community capacity to interpret, contest, and act on acoustic data.
Participatory soundscape evaluation
Rather than delegating interpretation to technical experts, gather community members to collectively score acoustic environments. Walk a route together; record at each stop; then sit together and name what you heard, what it meant, and what it should mean for planning decisions. Technical measurements become evidence when a community has collectively decided what they prove. Export from Noisecatcher and project the pin map as a focus for group interpretation.
Graphic scoring & emotional body mapping
Quantitative dB readings cannot capture the felt impact of living inside a noise environment. Graphic scoring — drawing the shape of a sound, its rhythm, its violence — and emotional body mapping — locating where noise is felt in the body — allow non-technical participants to contribute testimony that numbers alone cannot produce. Combine these with Noisecatcher voice notes and pin descriptions to build a multi-register evidence corpus.
Live archiving
Record and share audio immediately, creating a real-time civic record before the event is reframed by official narrative. Radio With Palestine (RWP) demonstrates this method at scale: broadcasting unedited audio from occupied territories produces what it calls 'flat listening' — an omnidirectional document of the full acoustic context. At a local scale: stream or upload your Noisecatcher recordings in real time to a shared folder, a community radio station, or a Signal group. The distributed archive is harder to suppress than any single recording.
Acoustic counter-mapping
Official strategic noise maps are computed from infrastructure data — they model major sources but miss secondary ones, produce annual averages that conceal peak exposures, and tend to be more accurate in wealthier areas where monitoring infrastructure already exists. Counter-mapping fills these gaps: use Noisecatcher to measure where official maps are silent, document temporal patterns the averages erase, and produce an evidence base for community advocacy. Export your pins as GeoJSON and overlay them on official map data to show the gap between what the model predicts and what residents experience.
Collective evidence-building
A single measurement is a data point. A month of measurements is a pattern. A neighbourhood of measurements is a case. Coordinate with neighbours, community organisations, or local journalists to build overlapping, independent records of the same acoustic environment. Noisecatcher's GeoJSON export is compatible with NoiseCapture (Université Gustave Eiffel) — your pins can feed directly into community datasets. Environmental agencies and planning authorities respond to spatial patterns, not isolated incidents.
Links verified June 2026. Noisecatcher does not endorse or control external sites.