Noisecatcher

What to do

Measuring noise is step one. Understand it, map it, and use it.

Noise is not equally distributed

Noise pollution is an environmental justice issue. Across cities worldwide, low-income neighbourhoods, communities of colour, and renters near highways, airports, and industrial zones bear a disproportionate noise burden — while having the least political power to challenge it.

🏫

Children & schools

WHO recommends ≤35 dB(A) inside classrooms. Schools near expressways routinely exceed 70 dB. Chronic noise impairs reading, memory, and cognitive development. This is not an individual problem — it is a policy failure.

🌙

Night workers & shift workers

WHO guidelines set 40 dB(A) Lnight for outdoor residential areas. Freight hubs, distribution centres, and transit depots impose a second noise burden on communities that already work night hours.

🏘️

Renters & housing precarity

Homeowners can move. Tenants often cannot. Noise ordinance enforcement is weaker in areas with lower property values and higher tenant turnover. Documenting patterns over time — exactly what this app enables — is how tenants build cases.

🌿

Right to quiet

Access to quiet natural soundscapes is an environmental right. The EU's Environmental Noise Directive mandates the protection of 'quiet areas' in agglomerations. Urban green space is not just aesthetic — it is acoustic refuge.

WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region (2018)

Know the thresholds

The WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines (2018) set the following maximum safe levels for the European Region. These are recommendations — not legally binding in most countries — but they are the scientific basis for noise law across the EU and beyond.

Road traffic53 dB(A) Lden45 dB(A) Lnight
Aviation45 dB(A) Lden40 dB(A) Lnight
Railway54 dB(A) Lden44 dB(A) Lnight
Wind turbines45 dB(A) Lden
Leisure venues70 dB(A) LAeq
Schools (indoor)35 dB(A) LAeq

Lden = day-evening-night weighted average. Lnight = 23:00–07:00. Most urban environments exceed several of these thresholds.

The scale of the crisis

In Europe, noise pollution is the second largest environmental health riskafter air pollution. The European Environment Agency's 2025 report quantifies the damage for the first time at full scale.

73,000

premature deaths per year in Europe from transport noise (EEA 2025)

1.3 M

DALYs (disability-adjusted life-years) lost annually — up from 1 M in 2011

22,000

new type 2 diabetes cases per year in Europe linked to noise exposure

€95.6 B

estimated annual economic cost of transport noise in Europe (EEA 2025)

These figures cover Europe only. No equivalent global estimate exists — most cities in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America have no peer-reviewed noise monitoring data. Among the cities with documented research: Cairo (85–90 dB average street noise, Egyptian NRC); Ho Chi Minh City (103 dB, UN-cited); São Paulo schools (70.3 dB LAeq weekdays, Nature 2026). The absence of data does not mean the absence of harm.

EEA — Environmental Noise in Europe 2025

Noise as a human rights issue

Across jurisdictions, courts and legislatures have established that noise pollution is not merely an inconvenience but a violation of fundamental rights. These instruments give your data legal standing.

ECHR Article 8 — Hatton v. UK (2003)

The European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) held that states have positive obligations to protect residents from severe noise under the right to private and family life. Heathrow night flights violated this right. Foundational for noise-based ECHR complaints in all Council of Europe member states.

India Supreme Court — Right to life (2005)

Forum for Prevention of Environmental and Sound Pollution v. Union of India (2005) SCC 733 ruled that 'freedom from noise pollution is part of the right to life' under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution — one of the strongest constitutional noise rulings globally, leading to a ban on firecrackers between 10pm and 6am.

US Noise Control Act (1972) — defunded 1981

The only comprehensive US federal noise law was gutted by the Reagan administration in 1981. The EPA Office of Noise Abatement and Control has been unfunded for 45 years. Noise regulation in the US is now fragmented across thousands of local ordinances, with weakest enforcement in the most exposed communities.

Colombia Law 2450/2025

Latin America's first dedicated national noise law, passed in 2025. Establishes noise limits, monitoring obligations, and enforcement mechanisms — a model for noise legislation in the Global South.

Sonic Apartheid — noise as racial geography

Research from the University of Cape Town (Alexandra Downing Watkins) documents how forced relocations in post-apartheid Cape Town (including Blikkiesdorp, cleared before the 2010 World Cup) placed Black and Coloured communities in high-noise industrial zones with no political recourse. US studies (Casey et al. 2017; Collins et al. 2020) document the same pattern nationally. Noise burden follows the lines of racial and economic geography — a structural injustice, not an accident.

How to use your measurements

Noisecatcher readings are indicative, not legally certified. A smartphone microphone is not a Class 1 or Class 2 sound level meter (IEC 61672-1:2013). This matters for how your data can be used.

What your data CAN do

Establish a documented pattern over time (recurring noise, specific times)

Support a complaint with timestamped, geolocated evidence

Demonstrate which WHO thresholds are routinely exceeded

Strengthen a collective case when combined with other contributors

Accompany a request for official certified measurement

Provide evidence for tenant-landlord disputes

What your data CANNOT do alone

Serve as sole technical evidence in legal proceedings

Replace a certified noise assessment (e.g., for planning disputes)

Prove absolute sound pressure levels with regulatory precision

Export your pins as GeoJSON from the map page. The file includes dB readings, timestamps, GPS coordinates, bearing, category, pin status, and description — enough to build a documented case. The export is also compatible with NoiseCapture (Université Gustave Eiffel), the open-source citizen noise sensing platform, so your data can feed directly into community datasets.

Measurement methodology

Forensic documentation techniques, acoustic science (dBA / dBC / dBZ / NDSI), AI classification caveats, chain-of-custody guidance, advanced smartphone sensing, and known limitations — all on the Methodology page.

Community data & Noise-Planet federation

You are not measuring alone. Noise-Planet aggregates millions of dB(A) readings contributed by NoiseCapture users worldwide into an open, queryable map. In Noisecatcher, you can overlay this community data directly on your map — and export your pins back in NoiseCapture-compatible GeoJSON to contribute to the commons.

🌍

Overlay community data

The Noise-Planet community layer shows crowdsourced noise measurements from around the world. Use it to contextualise your own readings, identify chronic hotspots others have documented, and understand your neighbourhood in a global acoustic frame.

📤

Export as NoiseCapture GeoJSON

Your pins export in a format compatible with NoiseCapture and the OGC standard. Each feature carries laeq, timestamp, GPS coordinates, category, pin status (predicted/active/historical), and description. Attach this file to complaints, submit it to environmental agencies, or share it with researchers.

📊

Collective cases are stronger

A single measurement establishes a data point. A month of measurements establishes a pattern. A neighbourhood of measurements — yours and your neighbours', overlaid with community data — establishes a crisis. Environmental agencies and courts respond to spatial patterns, not isolated incidents.

Noise-Planet — open crowdsourced noise science (Université Gustave Eiffel)

Template complaint

Adapt this to your situation. Attach your exported GeoJSON or screenshots as supporting evidence.

Subject: Formal noise complaint — [address / location] To whom it may concern, I am writing to report persistent noise pollution at [location], which I have documented using the Noisecatcher noise monitoring application. Measurements taken on [dates] between [times] recorded levels of [X] dB(A), exceeding the WHO Environmental Noise Guideline of [relevant threshold] dB(A) for [road traffic / aviation / industrial] noise. This noise is [recurring / constant] and has caused [describe impact: sleep disruption, health effects, inability to work, etc.]. I am requesting: 1. An official noise assessment of [location] by a certified acoustic engineer. 2. Enforcement of applicable noise regulations. 3. A written response to this complaint. Supporting documentation is enclosed. Yours sincerely, [Name, address, contact]

Worldwide Reporting Resources

Official reporting channels, environmental agencies, legal frameworks, and advocacy organisations — covering 30+ countries across all world regions.

41 countries & regions · 117 resources worldwide

🇨🇦 CanadaNorth America

Environment and Climate Change Canada — noiseGOVNAV Canada — aircraft noiseGOVOntario MOE — noise guidelinesLAW

Environmental protection is shared between federal and provincial governments.

🇦🇷 ArgentinaLatin America

SAyDS — ruido ambientalGOV

🇮🇳 IndiaAsia-Pacific

CPCB — Noise Pollution (Regulation & Control) Rules 2000LAWMinistry of Environment — noise standardsGOVPCB Complaint portal — state pollution control boardsGOV

Complaints filed with State Pollution Control Boards. Dial 1800-11-4000 for environmental helpline.

🇦🇺 AustraliaAsia-Pacific

EPA Victoria — noise complaintsGOVEPA NSW — noiseGOVARPANSA — aviation noiseGOVANEF — Aircraft Noise Exposure ForecastMAP

Environmental protection is a state responsibility — contact your state EPA.

🇦🇪 UAEMiddle East

Ministry of Climate Change & EnvironmentGOVDubai Municipality — noise complaintsGOVAbu Dhabi EAD — environmental noiseGOV

شكاوى الضوضاء: اتصل ببلدية دبي على 800900 أو هيئة البيئة والمياه.

🌍 WHO Africa RegionAfrica

WHO AFRO — environmental healthSCI

Advocacy & support

Noise Abatement Society (UK)Noise Free AmericaQuiet Communities (USA)Right to Quiet Society (international)Bruitparif — observatoire du bruit en Île-de-FranceEarshot NGO — acoustic advocacyNoise Planet — open noise scienceEnd Transport Poverty (UK)Réseau Action Climat (France)European Environment Agency — noise data

Field protocols — high-risk situations

These protocols apply when you are documenting in dangerous conditions. Adapt them to your local legal context. In all cases: your safety first, documentation second.

🔊 Sonic warfare / LRAD / acoustic weapons

  • Move perpendicular, not back. LRAD beams are narrow (~15–30°). Stepping sideways cuts intensity faster than retreating.
  • Protect your ears immediately. Foam earplugs reduce exposure by ~30 dB. Cupping hands over ears is a stopgap. Hearing damage from a single LRAD exposure is permanent.
  • Start recording before the event. Capture at minimum: bearing, distance estimate, number of pulses, any warning given. Noisecatcher logs GPS + Leq automatically.
  • Note the operator (police unit, vehicle markings, private security) and any crowd size or conditions. This is essential for legal accountability.
  • Document after: note any tinnitus, hearing loss, dizziness, or nausea — these are symptoms of acoustic trauma and may support a legal complaint.
  • Do not aim your phone directly at the LRAD transducer at close range; the microphone membrane can be damaged.

✊ Protest / civil unrest

  • Record continuously from the start, not only when sound levels spike. Timestamp gaps are exploited in court to dispute the sequence of events.
  • Log the quiet too. A pin documenting baseline crowd noise before police deployment establishes reference; a second pin after documents the escalation.
  • Keep your screen dim and notifications silent. Bright screens draw attention; notification sounds can trigger alerts from crowd control.
  • Enable airplane mode + Wi-Fi only if you suspect IMSI catcher surveillance — GPS still works without mobile data.
  • Back up continuously. Use Noisecatcher's export to send pins to a secure cloud or a trusted contact before any detention risk.
  • Know your legal rights to record in public in your jurisdiction before you attend. In most democracies, audio recording in public is lawful; some require all-party consent.

🚔 Police arrest / detention

  • Export and share your data before arrest becomes likely. Once your device is seized, recordings may be inaccessible or deleted.
  • Use a strong PIN, not biometrics. In many jurisdictions, police can compel biometric unlock; a PIN requires a court order.
  • Note the time of arrest and any sounds during detention: commands given, weapons used, ambient noise level. You can reconstruct a log later from memory.
  • Request a lawyer before any interview. Do not discuss your recordings or documentation methods without legal counsel.
  • After release, write a detailed account immediately including all acoustic events (flash-bangs, sirens, shouting, crowd noise) with approximate times.

🚧 Border control / checkpoint

  • Document before you reach the checkpoint — once officers have visual contact, open recording is difficult. Use a timed session from inside a bag if legally permitted.
  • Record checkpoint soundscape as evidence: loudspeaker commands, vehicle noise, alarm systems, and the frequency/volume of orders given can document degrading treatment.
  • Keep data encrypted and backed up remotely before crossing. Border agents in many countries may search devices without a warrant.
  • If a device is seized, note the time, the officer's name or badge number, and any receipts given. Report to a digital rights organisation (EFF, Access Now, Reporters Without Borders).
  • Log GPS coordinates at the checkpoint. For occupied territories, this georeferenced data is valuable to human rights organisations.

⚠️ White supremacist attack / far-right violence

  • Safety first: leave the area if you can do so safely. Do not stay to document if doing so puts you at direct physical risk.
  • From a safe distance, capture audio continuously. Far-right intimidation relies heavily on amplified sound: bullhorns, vehicle horns, coordinated chanting. These are acoustic evidence of targeted harassment.
  • Record slurs, threats, and commands verbatim in a text note immediately after. Audio corroboration of specific language strengthens hate crime reporting.
  • Log the category as "Fascism / far-right violence" in Noisecatcher with an accurate description. GPS, timestamp, and Leq make the record harder to dismiss.
  • Report to: local police (request a hate crime reference number), national extremism monitoring organisations (HOPE not hate, ADL, SOS Racisme, etc.), and anti-fascist legal support networks.
  • Share your export with a trusted contact or organisation before any police interaction — recordings of hate crimes have been seized and suppressed.

From measurement to justice practice

Measurement alone is not a justice practice. A noise map without community interpretation is just another dataset — one that can be absorbed by the same planning systems that produced the injustice. The methods below move from recording to power: they build community capacity to interpret, contest, and act on acoustic data.

🗺️

Participatory soundscape evaluation

Rather than delegating interpretation to technical experts, gather community members to collectively score acoustic environments. Walk a route together; record at each stop; then sit together and name what you heard, what it meant, and what it should mean for planning decisions. Technical measurements become evidence when a community has collectively decided what they prove. Export from Noisecatcher and project the pin map as a focus for group interpretation.

🎨

Graphic scoring & emotional body mapping

Quantitative dB readings cannot capture the felt impact of living inside a noise environment. Graphic scoring — drawing the shape of a sound, its rhythm, its violence — and emotional body mapping — locating where noise is felt in the body — allow non-technical participants to contribute testimony that numbers alone cannot produce. Combine these with Noisecatcher voice notes and pin descriptions to build a multi-register evidence corpus.

📻

Live archiving

Record and share audio immediately, creating a real-time civic record before the event is reframed by official narrative. Radio With Palestine (RWP) demonstrates this method at scale: broadcasting unedited audio from occupied territories produces what it calls 'flat listening' — an omnidirectional document of the full acoustic context. At a local scale: stream or upload your Noisecatcher recordings in real time to a shared folder, a community radio station, or a Signal group. The distributed archive is harder to suppress than any single recording.

🔍

Acoustic counter-mapping

Official strategic noise maps are computed from infrastructure data — they model major sources but miss secondary ones, produce annual averages that conceal peak exposures, and tend to be more accurate in wealthier areas where monitoring infrastructure already exists. Counter-mapping fills these gaps: use Noisecatcher to measure where official maps are silent, document temporal patterns the averages erase, and produce an evidence base for community advocacy. Export your pins as GeoJSON and overlay them on official map data to show the gap between what the model predicts and what residents experience.

🏛️

Collective evidence-building

A single measurement is a data point. A month of measurements is a pattern. A neighbourhood of measurements is a case. Coordinate with neighbours, community organisations, or local journalists to build overlapping, independent records of the same acoustic environment. Noisecatcher's GeoJSON export is compatible with NoiseCapture (Université Gustave Eiffel) — your pins can feed directly into community datasets. Environmental agencies and planning authorities respond to spatial patterns, not isolated incidents.

Sources: LaBelle, B., Sonic Agency(Goldsmiths Press, 2018); Gieysztor et al., 'Sonic Injustice: A Systematic Review' (2023); Maisonneuve et al., 'NoiseTube' (IFIP, 2009); Columbia University Libraries / Openwork, 'Being Heard' (2024).

Links verified June 2026. Noisecatcher does not endorse or control external sites.